Go Back   Cruise Critic Message Board Forums > Cruise Critic News & Feature Articles
 
Register here!
Forgot Your Password?


Notices

Cruise Critic News & Feature Articles Up-to-the minute News & Feature Articles from Cruise Critic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 1st, 2010, 07:10 AM
LauraS's Avatar
LauraS LauraS is offline
Sr. Manager, Community
Cruise Critic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 13,175
Post Liverpool and Southampton on the verge of Cruise Wars

Cruise Critic has just posted the following news:

Liverpool and Southampton on the verge of Cruise Wars

Read the entire news article...
Reply With Quote

Ad Sponsored By
  #2  
Old November 3rd, 2010, 07:22 AM
philhar philhar is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wallasey,U.K.
Posts: 201
Default Frustrating!

This is a very disappointing argument between 2 English ports.Lines moved away from Liverpool to Southampton in the 60's mainly because Med cruises were all the rage and it took a day longer from Liverpool.Now there are far more Scandinavian cruises, better suited to Liverpool and for Med options many people like sea days and so do cruise lines, they make more money!!
However,it is a real pain to get to Southampton from the North west I always feel particularly on the way back that it negates some of the good of the holiday by travelling for so long.
When the day turnaround facility was built at Liverpool no-one was brave enough to think bigger.The building next to the landing stage is too small to deal with checking in passengers,it's tiny that should have been thought through.Also Peel holdings should have paid for it (they could easily afford it) and then Southampton could have no objection.
Peel have now submitted their own plans to build a cruise terminal but that will take years to sort out.
Forward thinking was not good.
Even if Liverpool had a proper turnaround facility, Southampton would still have the lions share of UK traffic becuase of it's postion.Is a bit of competition not healthy?
Also, if you've been in Southampton when there are more than 2 ships in at a time it's a nightmare!!!
__________________

Old Oriana x2,
Chusan,
Legend of the Seas x2 ,Empress of Britain,
Vistafjord, Ellinis,
Carousel, Queen Frederica,
QE2 x2 ,Fairstar,
Costa Riviera ,Reina Del Mar x2,
Northern Star x3,
Ocean Monarch x2,
Canberra x2,
Braemar 08/01
Sea Princess 05/05
13/08/06 Norwegian Jewel Med cruise,
22/07/07 Oceana Summer Splendour Cruise,
19/07/09 Voyager of the Seas Med cruise.
03/06/11 Oriana 2 night cruise


url=http://www.cruise-ships.com][/url]
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old November 3rd, 2010, 08:42 AM
Rock Chick's Avatar
Rock Chick Rock Chick is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cheshire ENGLAND
Posts: 1,457
Default

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I have registered my support for the Liverpool terminal. The extra tourists would boost the local economy. John Lennon Airport is only a few miles away from the terminal and there are plenty of hotels in all price ranges locally. I did a transatlantic cruise last year from Galveston and the biggest challenge of my trip was getting home from Southampton on a Sunday.

I'm all for a bit of healthy competition. I've been cruising for many years and would love the opportunity to join a cruise ship without having to spend a day or more travelling to join it.
__________________
Navigator of the Seas, Mediterranean, May 12
Norwegian Epic, Eastern and Western Caribbean, December 10
Voyager of the Seas, Transatlantic, April 09
Mariner of the Seas, Caribbean, September 08
Voyager of the Seas, Transatlantic, April 08
Thomson Destiny, Canary Islands, Nov 07
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old November 3rd, 2010, 09:10 AM
jaz33's Avatar
jaz33 jaz33 is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Halifax, Yorkshire UK
Posts: 618
Default

Competition is good for everyone, especially the passengers, so bring it on Liverpool.
__________________
Ian & Tracy


Booked Cruises



Past Cruises

Celebrity Horizon - Western Caribbean 9 nights Dec 2004
Thomson Spirit - Red Sea - 7 Nights Feb 2006
Celebrity Constellation - Southern Caribbean - 9 nights Dec 2006
Voyager of the Seas – Barcelona - 3 nights May 2007
Island Star - Western Mediterranean - 7 nights October 2007
Celebrity Summit - Transatlantic - March - April 2008 – 12 Nights
Independence of the Seas - Western Mediterranean 15 August 2009 – 14 Nights
Celebrity Eclipse - Spanish Mediterranean - 24 July 2010 – 14 Nights
Jewel of the Seas - Scandinavia and Russia - 29 July 2011 - 12 Nights
NCL Jade - Madeira and the Canary Islands - 17 December 2011 - 9 Nights
Celebrity Eclipse - Iceland and the Fjords - 04 August 2012 – 14 Nights
Adventure of the Seas - Mediterranean - 04 August 2013 – 14 Nights
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old November 3rd, 2010, 09:44 AM
KarenR_UK's Avatar
KarenR_UK KarenR_UK is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hamwic, Hants, UK
Posts: 1,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaz33 View Post
Competition is good for everyone, especially the passengers, so bring it on Liverpool.
Fair competion is good but ...

As far as the owners of the port of Southampton is concerned it is not fair competition as they have had to use their own (private) money to upgrade all their cruise facilities, whereas the owners of the port of Liverpool have used EU (public) money to build the facilities they now want to use in competition

If they pay back the EU grant they received, then there would\should be no opposition to their plans.

I can understand people wanting to cruise from locations closer to home (I almost certainly wouldn't be cruising if it was not for Southampton being close) but if going to the Med, would you really want to spend another day at sea in British Waters ?
__________________
Cunard Queen Victoria July 2012 (Med), May 2010 (Med), Nov 2009 (Canaries); QE2 Oct 2008 (Iberia), Aug 2008 (Med), Nov 2007 (Canaries), Jun 2007 (Iceland & Norway), Aug 2006 (Med); Caronia Sept 2003 (Iberian Coast)
P+O Arcadia June 2013 (mainly Spain) Azura Sept 2011 (Atlantic Coast), Aurora Dec 2010 (Christmas Transatlantic Caribbean ), May 2010 (Weekender), July 2009 & Apr 2008 (Adriatic); Ventura Sept 2008 (Weekender); Oceana Oct 2005 (Canaries), Sept 2004 (Med)
Azamara Quest Nov 2011 (Adriatic Fly-Cruise)
Celebrity Eclipse April 2011 (4day 'Weekender')
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old November 3rd, 2010, 09:45 AM
alanbab alanbab is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bolton, England
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philhar View Post
This is a very disappointing argument between 2 English ports.Lines moved away from Liverpool to Southampton in the 60's mainly because Med cruises were all the rage and it took a day longer from Liverpool.Now there are far more Scandinavian cruises, better suited to Liverpool and for Med options many people like sea days and so do cruise lines, they make more money!!
However,it is a real pain to get to Southampton from the North west I always feel particularly on the way back that it negates some of the good of the holiday by travelling for so long.
When the day turnaround facility was built at Liverpool no-one was brave enough to think bigger.The building next to the landing stage is too small to deal with checking in passengers,it's tiny that should have been thought through.Also Peel holdings should have paid for it (they could easily afford it) and then Southampton could have no objection.
Peel have now submitted their own plans to build a cruise terminal but that will take years to sort out.
Forward thinking was not good.
Even if Liverpool had a proper turnaround facility, Southampton would still have the lions share of UK traffic becuase of it's postion.Is a bit of competition not healthy?
Also, if you've been in Southampton when there are more than 2 ships in at a time it's a nightmare!!!
I totally agree with everything that Philhar has to say. There are thousands of us up North who would love to cruise in and out of Liverpool. And yes the extra sea days would be very welcome - I would love to see Celebrity and RCCL up here. Bring it on. I too will be registering our support for a turnaround terminal in Liverpool - don't take too long though - I'm a pensioner now!!!
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old November 3rd, 2010, 10:57 AM
stephendee stephendee is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bangor, Northern Ireland
Posts: 36
Default

As much as Southampton is convenient for a lot of people, travelling from Northern Ireland to there is not just as easy flightwise as say, Belfast to Barcelona for example. Flights to Liverpool would suit us perfectly and I for one would be happy enough for "Healthy Competition" if it enabled me to have an easier transit to my cruise ship port. As for the extra sea day, I don,t see it as a problem. This is, of course, my own personal opinion. Wait and see....wait and see......
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old November 3rd, 2010, 01:48 PM
Patricia-anne Patricia-anne is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarenR_UK View Post
Fair competion is good but ...

As far as the owners of the port of Southampton is concerned it is not fair competition as they have had to use their own (private) money to upgrade all their cruise facilities, whereas the owners of the port of Liverpool have used EU (public) money to build the facilities they now want to use in competition

If they pay back the EU grant they received, then there would\should be no opposition to their plans.

I can understand people wanting to cruise from locations closer to home (I almost certainly wouldn't be cruising if it was not for Southampton being close) but if going to the Med, would you really want to spend another day at sea in British Waters ?
Over the years I am sure Southampton has/will recoup any money they have spent by the huge number of cruise ships which sail from there. It could not do any harm to let Liverpool have a few ships in for turnaround. Langton Dock is an eyesore, and the locking system out into the Mersey is painfully slow. There is little in the way of facilities at Langton Dock - crane for lifting off luggage, public transport nearby, decent embarkation hall, refreshment and toilet facilities all poor or totally absent. I live in the northwest and hate having to travel to Southampton, Harwich or Dover. It usually means an overnight stay which adds to the cost of the cruise, I'd rather spend that money on my visits ashore. It is far easier for people from Ireland, the Isle of Man , Midlands, Scotland and Wales to get to Liverpool than having to go all the way to Southampton. On one occasion when we sailed from there and there were two huge liners in as well as our much smaller ship, the traffic jam to get into the port was so dreadful we nearly missed the ship! Come on Southampton, dont be greedy, a few ships using Liverpool is not really going to do you any harm.
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old November 5th, 2010, 09:03 AM
jaz33's Avatar
jaz33 jaz33 is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Halifax, Yorkshire UK
Posts: 618
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarenR_UK View Post
Fair competion is good but ...

As far as the owners of the port of Southampton is concerned it is not fair competition as they have had to use their own (private) money to upgrade all their cruise facilities, whereas the owners of the port of Liverpool have used EU (public) money to build the facilities they now want to use in competition

If they pay back the EU grant they received, then there would\should be no opposition to their plans.

I can understand people wanting to cruise from locations closer to home (I almost certainly wouldn't be cruising if it was not for Southampton being close) but if going to the Med, would you really want to spend another day at sea in British Waters ?
While the owners fight over what is fair and what is not there is only one loser and that is the fare paying passengers. I personally don't mind travelleing to Southampton, as the roads are fairly good from where we are and I also include an overnight stay as part of the holiday, but I would like the choice. Sailing from Liverpool would open up many other destinations for those of us that don't always want to go away for the 'sun'. As far as I can see opening up Liverpool as a turnaround port would hardly affect Southampton as that port would keep the majority of th Med traffic. Don't forget that there is life above the Home Counties
__________________
Ian & Tracy


Booked Cruises



Past Cruises

Celebrity Horizon - Western Caribbean 9 nights Dec 2004
Thomson Spirit - Red Sea - 7 Nights Feb 2006
Celebrity Constellation - Southern Caribbean - 9 nights Dec 2006
Voyager of the Seas – Barcelona - 3 nights May 2007
Island Star - Western Mediterranean - 7 nights October 2007
Celebrity Summit - Transatlantic - March - April 2008 – 12 Nights
Independence of the Seas - Western Mediterranean 15 August 2009 – 14 Nights
Celebrity Eclipse - Spanish Mediterranean - 24 July 2010 – 14 Nights
Jewel of the Seas - Scandinavia and Russia - 29 July 2011 - 12 Nights
NCL Jade - Madeira and the Canary Islands - 17 December 2011 - 9 Nights
Celebrity Eclipse - Iceland and the Fjords - 04 August 2012 – 14 Nights
Adventure of the Seas - Mediterranean - 04 August 2013 – 14 Nights
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old November 5th, 2010, 01:40 PM
David&Heather's Avatar
David&Heather David&Heather is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Liverpool UK
Posts: 666
Default

We have done one cruise out of Southampton due to having our previously booked fly cruise cancelled due to the ash cloud earlier this year, we wont be cruising from Southampton again any time soon, the journey there was long and tedious and on arrival we found our terminal (Mayflower) in the middle of an industrial wasteland.
The terminal itself was adequate and efficient but on arrival at our cabin the view from the balcony was simply horrible - 2 massive piles of scrap metal awaiting export!
Compare to that the pier head terminal at Liverpool with it's iconic backdrop of famous buildings which is on par with the likes of New York and Sydney.
Liverpool is well situated with 2 major airports close by, it takes about the same time by train from London to Liverpool as it does to Southampton, not a lot of diffrence by road either.
Liverpool has a hell of a lot to offer both cruise lines and visitors, it also gives those who do not live in London or the South a much easier place to start their cruises from.
We hope the development goes ahead soon and will be booking on one of the first cruises out of the terminal. Until then we will be giving Southampton a wide berth and booking fly cruises as it's much easier for us to fly from Manchester to join our cruise than travel to Southampton.
__________________
Past Cruises:
OV2 Med Cruise 14th October 2008 - Our first cruise, we loved it.
OV2 Caribbean 18th February 2009.
OV1 Caribbean 23rd December 2009 - A great cruise sadly our last with OV.
Grand Princess 7th August 2010 - Got married at seccond attempt!
Star Princess 29th July 2011 Venice to Rome - Simply Superb.
Crown Princess 16th August 2012 Rome to Venice - Lovely Cruise, Lovely ship.
Golden Princess 30th January 2013 LA to Hawaiian Islands - The cruise that we thought we would never be able to do, totally unforgettable.
Ruby Princess 16th August 2013 Rome to Venice - We should have been married on this ship in April 2010 but the Icelandic ash cloud had other idea's! - Celebrated our 3rd wedding anniversary on this cruise
Reply With Quote

  #11  
Old November 6th, 2010, 08:10 AM
liverpoollad liverpoollad is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: neston.wirral. uk
Posts: 400
Default

I can understand Southamptons dispute because of EU fundings etc., but because of the logistics Liverpool would have found it hard to get private funding to become a turnaround port. How many sailings are from Southampton per year (hundreds?) how many does Liverpool want (20/30?)
Southampton will not suffer as they will always have the major share, so let Liverpool have their small amount.
OR...maybe Southampton are afraid of Liverpool being voted by Tripadvisor European contributors as the 5th favourite place to visit in the UK.
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old November 8th, 2010, 06:56 AM
Cunard Liverpool Cunard Liverpool is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 9
Default Southamptons petty protest should never have been allowed

[quote=liverpoollad;26769879]I can understand Southamptons dispute because of EU fundings etc., but because of the logistics Liverpool would have found it hard to get private funding to become a turnaround port. quote]

I can not understand Southamptons dispute.
They could have applied for EU funding to expand their facilities, they either chose not to, someone slipped up or they were turned down by the EU (probably because they are awash with funds from cruise lines fees)
Either way Southampton are being very petty with their protest.

Liverpool have a great history as a turnaround port which must be revived,
for the sake of everyone (except the wealthy, overcrowded Southampton)
Reply With Quote

  #13  
Old November 8th, 2010, 01:05 PM
pugwash14 pugwash14 is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southampton
Posts: 17
Default Southampton/Liverpool dispute

The trouble as I see it, is that Liverpool has always relied upon State handouts in all their endeavours. Well let me tell them here and now, your Banker, (New Labour), went out in May and they'll be no more funding for you guys to splash around. Here in Southampton, we have had no Government funding throughout New Labours 13 years of profligacy, unlike Liverpool. What we have built is with private funding, something you'll have to get used to, that is if you can find anybody brave enough to splash the cash.

Secondly, the physical side of ship owner's preferences, favours Southampton, which is blessed with 2 high tides and 2 secondary high tides each 24 hours and a minimal tidal range unlike Liverpool,. In addition it has three new passenger handling terminals. OK one may overlook wasteland and a scrap heap when boarding from 106 Berth Western Docks,, but how long does one look at that before sailing? The difficulties with Liverpool is the fast flowing Mersey, the use of locks and the general antiquity of the whole dockside. I should know, I sailed from there many times when in the Merchant Navy in the 50's and 60's.

Shipowners have also based their Head Offices in the Port and just to add salt to the wound, we are closer to London and other large conurbations than Liverpool.

All in all, this is just sour grapes when Liverpool can see just how successful Southampton is. Furthermore, Liverpool could not handle more than one liner at a time if they are having their turn-round in that port, unlike Southampton, which can handle as many as 5 in one day.

Pugwash
Reply With Quote

  #14  
Old November 9th, 2010, 03:50 AM
David&Heather's Avatar
David&Heather David&Heather is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Liverpool UK
Posts: 666
Default

Could one of the moderators please do something about the above politically motivated post.
__________________
Past Cruises:
OV2 Med Cruise 14th October 2008 - Our first cruise, we loved it.
OV2 Caribbean 18th February 2009.
OV1 Caribbean 23rd December 2009 - A great cruise sadly our last with OV.
Grand Princess 7th August 2010 - Got married at seccond attempt!
Star Princess 29th July 2011 Venice to Rome - Simply Superb.
Crown Princess 16th August 2012 Rome to Venice - Lovely Cruise, Lovely ship.
Golden Princess 30th January 2013 LA to Hawaiian Islands - The cruise that we thought we would never be able to do, totally unforgettable.
Ruby Princess 16th August 2013 Rome to Venice - We should have been married on this ship in April 2010 but the Icelandic ash cloud had other idea's! - Celebrated our 3rd wedding anniversary on this cruise
Reply With Quote

  #15  
Old November 9th, 2010, 07:14 AM
scrozuk's Avatar
scrozuk scrozuk is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southampton
Posts: 321
Default

I think the main points of this discussion has been that PAX who have to travel from the North want to have a port close to them, which is perfectly understandable.

I feel that there should be more development of other ports to handle cruise ships. As a taxpayer though, I wouldn't want to be paying out for a city to have a nice new cruise terminal that I might never use, when that money could be used elsewhere. Southampton will always be a preferred choice for the Med cruises as it's relatively closer, and it's not too bad for Scandinavia, once you swing out of the Channel and into the North Sea

Harwich I feel gets a bit of a raw deal, and if they could get a better cruise terminal setup could be more tempting for passengers travelling to Scandinavia.

Then maybe a cruise terminal could be opened in Newcastle, or even Edinburgh. These would be ideal ports to go to North Europe/Scandinavia.

Unfortunately, I feel that the Liverpool/Southampton Cruise Terminal War will garner no winners for either side, and feel that ultimately could be decided by the cruise ship operators themselves, due to fuel price rises still going on.

I think we are under no illusion that all cruise ship operators want to maximise their profits as much as possible. If any cruises were to leave Liverpool or wherever else, should the fuel cost be about 25% more, you can guarantee that they'll make the cruise cost 40% more.

Build more cruise terminals, yes. Although the benefits of the current cruise ship schedule in Southampton is supposed to benefit the local economy, there seems to be little evidence of the money being invested in the area..

ScrozUK
__________________
Sailed
MV Bolero - Iberian Cruise - November 1999
RCCL Legend of the Seas - Canaries Cruise - October 2006
RCCL Independence of the Seas - West Med Cruise - August 2008
P&O Ventura - Baltics and St. Petersburg - May 2009
RCCL Majesty of Seas - Cococay/Nassau - November 2009
P&O Ventura - Iberia Cruise - April 2013
Reply With Quote

  #16  
Old November 9th, 2010, 04:23 PM
liverpoollad liverpoollad is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: neston.wirral. uk
Posts: 400
Default

Pugwash14.

I will not demean myself replying to your post, all I can say you must not have been to Liverpool waterfront for a long time. Don't forget 5th favourite place to visit in the UK.

Cheers
Reply With Quote

  #17  
Old November 9th, 2010, 05:37 PM
Pablo21 Pablo21 is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6
Default

Pugwash 14

All I can say is that you seem to base your opinion and knowledge of Liverpool on things you saw 60-70 years ago. You mention the general antiquity of the whole dockside. Yes, it may have been antiquated in the 50's and 60's but I think you would find that it has moved on a whole lot since then.
Also, your comment; "Liverpool has always relied upon State handouts in all their endeavours",is based on a reputation of this city conveyed by the media. For a start there is the £1 billion of PRIVATE investment on the Liverpool 1 shopping development. And that is just for starters. This city is on the up and that is without a lot of government help.
I don't think Southampton would have anything to worry about. As pointed out, the Cruise Liner Terminal can only take one ship at once. We could never compete with Southampton.
Reply With Quote

  #18  
Old November 10th, 2010, 07:07 AM
David&Heather's Avatar
David&Heather David&Heather is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Liverpool UK
Posts: 666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by liverpoollad View Post
Pugwash14.

I will not demean myself replying to your post, all I can say you must not have been to Liverpool waterfront for a long time. Don't forget 5th favourite place to visit in the UK.

Cheers
Certainly a much nicer place to visit than Southampton and yes I can comment as work takes me there on a regular basis.
__________________
Past Cruises:
OV2 Med Cruise 14th October 2008 - Our first cruise, we loved it.
OV2 Caribbean 18th February 2009.
OV1 Caribbean 23rd December 2009 - A great cruise sadly our last with OV.
Grand Princess 7th August 2010 - Got married at seccond attempt!
Star Princess 29th July 2011 Venice to Rome - Simply Superb.
Crown Princess 16th August 2012 Rome to Venice - Lovely Cruise, Lovely ship.
Golden Princess 30th January 2013 LA to Hawaiian Islands - The cruise that we thought we would never be able to do, totally unforgettable.
Ruby Princess 16th August 2013 Rome to Venice - We should have been married on this ship in April 2010 but the Icelandic ash cloud had other idea's! - Celebrated our 3rd wedding anniversary on this cruise
Reply With Quote

  #19  
Old November 10th, 2010, 08:07 AM
jaz33's Avatar
jaz33 jaz33 is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Halifax, Yorkshire UK
Posts: 618
Default

LOL, obviously the North/South divide still exists. Such a shame, when this could have been such an interesting thread, that pugwash had to bring it down to the lowest common denominator.
__________________
Ian & Tracy


Booked Cruises



Past Cruises

Celebrity Horizon - Western Caribbean 9 nights Dec 2004
Thomson Spirit - Red Sea - 7 Nights Feb 2006
Celebrity Constellation - Southern Caribbean - 9 nights Dec 2006
Voyager of the Seas – Barcelona - 3 nights May 2007
Island Star - Western Mediterranean - 7 nights October 2007
Celebrity Summit - Transatlantic - March - April 2008 – 12 Nights
Independence of the Seas - Western Mediterranean 15 August 2009 – 14 Nights
Celebrity Eclipse - Spanish Mediterranean - 24 July 2010 – 14 Nights
Jewel of the Seas - Scandinavia and Russia - 29 July 2011 - 12 Nights
NCL Jade - Madeira and the Canary Islands - 17 December 2011 - 9 Nights
Celebrity Eclipse - Iceland and the Fjords - 04 August 2012 – 14 Nights
Adventure of the Seas - Mediterranean - 04 August 2013 – 14 Nights
Reply With Quote

  #20  
Old November 11th, 2010, 02:40 PM
Rulocal's Avatar
Rulocal Rulocal is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 172
Default

Must agree with Jazz33 and say this could have been a very interestin thread, untill Pugwash spoiled it with his outdated political ravings :-(
__________________













Rulocal has sailed on :
Adventure of the Seas,Carnival Pride,Celebrity Infinity, Costa Victoria,
Costa Serena, Cunard QM2, MSC Orchestra,
Island Escape, Norwegian Sun, Norwegian Jade,
Independence of the Seas, Legend of the Seas,
Jewel of the Seas, Navigator of the Seas,
Vision of the Seas, Voyager of the Seas,
Thomson Celebration.
P&O Ventura, P&O Oriana
Some of them more than once

Blog
https://plus.google.com/113510323337632772537/about
Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks


Ad Sponsored By
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 AM.


© 1995 - 2014, The Independent Traveler, Inc. All rights reserved.
"A Community of People Who Love To Cruise"
All of the information contained within Cruise Critic is protected by copyright. You may, however, download a single copy only for your personal use.
Cookie ConsentCookie Policy